Partnership for Global Security: Leading the World to a Safer Future
Home Projects Publications Issues Official Documents About RANSAC Nuclear News 5/16/12
Location: Home / Official Documents / U.S. Government
Sitemap Contact
Search
Google www PGS
 
Richardson Certifies Safety, Security, Reliability of Nuclear Stockpile Without Nuclear Testing - December 22, 1998
Richardson Certifies Safety, Security, Reliability of Nuclear Stockpile Without Nuclear Testing

December 22, 1998


Makes Two Key National Security Decisions on Tritium and Pit Disassembly

Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today certified to the President that the nuclear stockpile is safe,secure and reliable without underground nuclear testing and made two key national security decisionsrelated to the stockpile. This is the third year that the Secretaries of Energy and Defense have beenrequired to report to the President about any problems identified in the stockpile that would require areturn to underground nuclear testing.

"This annual certification is one of the six safeguards that the President established for our adherenceto the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. I would not hesitate to tell the President if I thought weneeded to return to underground nuclear tests to assure the safety, security or reliability of thestockpile," Secretary Richardson said. "But I'm pleased to report that again this year we have certifiedthe safety and security of the nuclear deterrent and that stockpile stewardship, using science basedmethods rather than underground nuclear tests to determine the safety and reliability of our stockpile,is working. The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is important for our nation's security because it willhelp prevent other nations from developing advanced nuclear weapons."

To ensure the safety, security and reliability of the stockpile in the future, Secretary Richardsonannounced that he had selected the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Watts Bar and Sequoyah asthe preferred facilities for producing a future supply of tritium, an isotope of hydrogen that isessential for the proper functioning of nuclear weapons and the Savannah River Site as the preferredsite for a facility to disassemble plutonium pits from weapons being taken out of the stockpile.

Tritium

The United States has not produced tritium, an isotope of hydrogen, since 1988. Since tritium decaysat the rate of about 5% per year, the United States will need new tritium by 2005 to meet the needs ofa START I sized nuclear stockpile or by 2011 to meet the needs of a START II sized stockpile ifSTART II goes into effect.

Secretary Richardson chose the use of TVA reactors for producing tritium over construction of a newlinear accelerator at Savannah River, and designated TVA's Watts Bar and Sequoyah reactors as thepreferred facilities rather than paying for the completion of TVA's unfinished Bellefonte reactor. Secretary Richardson decided that Hanford's Fast Flux Test Facility should not play any role inproducing tritium for the nation's stockpile and he outlined a course for deciding whether it should berestarted to serve future civil research missions.

"Using the Watts Bar and Sequoyah reactors makes sense for our national security. It makes sensebecause it's a proven technology, it's the best deal for the taxpayers, and it has the flexibility we needto meet our present and future tritium needs," Richardson said. "It's the only option that doesn'trequire a large capital expenditure. If our goal of reaching further arms reduction agreements isreached, we may not need to exercise this option for many years and we will pay for tritium onlywhen it is needed. Finally, TVA is well suited for this work because meeting national security needsis part of its statutory charter and its reactors are government facilities."

Richardson announced that TVA has agreed to provide irradiation services to meet the Department ofEnergy's tritium needs under the terms of the Economy Act. The Economy Act ensures that servicesbetween different agencies of the government are provided at actual cost.

Richardson's decision followed an extensive review of the regulatory, cost, proliferation,environmental, technical and national security issues associated with each option. He visitedBellefonte, Watts Bar, the Savannah River Site twice, as well as making a visit to the Fast Flux TestFacility at Hanford to see the sites firsthand. He held over 20 meetings with technical experts,nongovernmental organizations, national security experts, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,community groups and elected officials to ensure he had thoroughly reviewed the issues affecting thedecision. The Energy Department also convened an interagency working group to examine thenonproliferation issues associated with the use of commercial reactors and concluded that anynonproliferation issues are manageable and should not preclude selection of commercial reactors.

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen said, "I commend Secretary Richardson for his leadership inensuring that our nuclear deterrent remains strong and credible now and in the future. We fullysupport the selection of existing TVA reactors to meet our future tritium needs and will work with theDepartment on implementing this important national security decision."

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Shirley Jackson said, "I understand SecretaryRichardson has announced his decision to select TVA's Watts Bar and Sequoyah reactors as apreferred alternative for a new tritium production source. Knowing how important this is to ournation's security, the NRC will review TVA's submittals and related DOE assessments, asexpeditiously as possible, to ensure that this alternative meets all licensing requirements in order toprotect public health and safety and the common defense and security."

"Secretary Richardson had a tough decision and made a wise choice -- one that will effectively meetour national security requirements and make wise use of taxpayer dollars over the long term," saidOffice of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew.

Secretary Richardson's announcement today fulfills the Department's 1995 commitment to selectbetween a commercial light reactor and a linear accelerator as the primary source of tritium by the endof 1998. Consistent with the Department's dual track strategy for tritium production, the linearaccelerator option has been designated as a backup technology. The Department will complete keyresearch and development milestones for the accelerator, but will not complete construction.

Pit Disassembly

Richardson selected the Savannah River Site as the preferred site for building and operating a pitdisassembly and conversion facility; one of the three key facilities needed by the United States todispose of surplus weapons plutonium.

"The pit disassembly facility is key to our efforts to dispose irreversibly of 50 metric tons of excessweapons plutonium," Richardson said. "Being able to do this safely and effectively is key to ensuringthe future security of the stockpile and, for the first time in history, begin the process of destroyinginstead of creating weapons-grade plutonium."

The facility would be used to disassemble nuclear weapons components (pits) and convert therecovered plutonium metal to an oxide form suitable for disposition (either immobilization or mixedoxide fuel (MOX) for reactors). In June of this year, the Department of Energy identified its PantexPlant near Amarillo, Texas, and the Savannah River Site near Aiken, S.C., as equally preferredlocations for building this facility pending additional public comment and detailed reviews. Today'sdecision follows extensive consideration of environment, safety and health, cost, nonproliferation,mission compatibility and pubic acceptance issues.

Previously, DOE named Savannah River as the preferred site for two other disposition facilities -- aplant to fabricate plutonium into mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, which would be burned in existingdomestic reactors, and a plant to immobilize plutonium in ceramic surrounded by vitrified high levelwaste.

"Choosing one site for the pit disassembly facility was not an easy choice because both sites areextremely well qualified and enjoy tremendous local, state and Congressional support," said SecretaryRichardson. "In the end, it really came down to which site could best accommodate this importantnonproliferation mission."

Savannah River was selected because the site has extensive experience with plutonium processing. Inaddition, co-location of the pit disassembly facility with other existing or planned facilities at the sitecould provide some savings in infrastructure.

The Energy Department is currently conducting a demonstration of a prototype pit disassembly andconversion system at DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory. The demonstration, which involvesdismantling of pits over a two-to-three year period, will provide important information for designingand operating a full-scale pit disassembly and conversion facility. The full-scale facility is to bedesigned and constructed in the 1999-2004 time frame, with production operations beginning in2005. Construction and operation of the full-scale facility is contingent on reaching agreement withRussia on plutonium disposition.

For the past two years, DOE has pursued its hybrid plutonium disposition strategy designed toirreversibly dispose of 50 metric tons of excess weapons plutonium. When the strategy is fullyimplemented, the United States will be destroying instead of creating weapons-grade plutonium forthe first time in history.



Section Menu:
White House
Department of Energy
Department of Defense
Department of State
Intelligence Community
General Accounting Office
Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission
Other Agencies


© 2007 Partnership for Global Security. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement.